So, you have some nice photos, taken during your last holiday. Maybe you generally love to take pictures and happen to have a stash on your computer. If you have a Digital SLR camera and would like to earn some extra money doing what you love, than stock photography might be what you are looking for.
When searching for a place to sell your photos you will come across endless amount of websites. Some are well known companies, such as Shutterstock, Adobe, Getty; some are less known. The question is how to choose the best site/s for you in order to avoid spending hours uploading and tagging your photos without having much or any sales at all.
LIST OF THE TOP 3 NON-EXCLUSIVE STOCK PHOTOGRAPHY WEBSITES:
- Relatively easy, stress-free application procedure. All you need to do is – sign up to Shutterstock contributor website, upload the scan of your photo ID and upload your best 10 photos for review.
- Quick reply on the status of your uploaded photos. When you upload your photos, they will be reviewed very quickly. Usually within 24 hours for commercial photos and about 48h for editorial, in my experience.
- Assessment of each submitted photo. Every submitted photo will be assessed individually, unlike some stock websites (such as Alamy) that judge your whole submission based on random selection of photos. For example, one not accepted photo on Alamy can make your whole submission rejected.
- Your earnings are updated frequently. More precisely, every fifteen minutes if someone downloads your photos, you can see it on your dashboard, alongside with the information about the location of the download and the list of the most downloaded photos.
- What to Shoot list. One of the new features on Shutterstock – the list of the topics that the customers are searching for the most in the given month. Very helpful tool for increasing the number of downloads.
- Low fee for subscription download. If your photo is downloaded via subscription, you will earn only $0.25 per image download ( $0.33 after you earn between $500 and $3000 and so on – bigger your lifetime earnings, bigger the fee per image download). However, if you photo is downloaded on demand or with custom/enhanced licence you will earn more.
- Possibility of paying 30% of your earnings due to American tax. If you don’t live in America and your country doesn’t have a treaty with America, 30% of your payment might be deducted for the tax purposes. If your country has a treaty with America you will need to fill in the form accessible from your Shutterstock account and that should save you from paying extra tax.
- Relatively higher royalty fees. Like other stock agencies, Adobe also has various royalty bands, depending on various factors. On my experience, these fees are slightly bigger and are available in currencies other than dollar (e.g. on my account, earnings are in pounds, since I live in United Kingdom) unlike Shutterstock, Getty etc.
- Easy application process and upload of photos. All you need to do is, create an Adobe ID and you can start uploading your photos. If you are an Adobe Lightroom user, you can upload photos directly from Adobe Cloud. After upload, the keywords are generated automatically; all you need to do is write a title and double check the keywords.
- High quality of photo submissions. This may be seen as a con at the same time, since only the best quality submissions are accepted due to very rigorous quality control. I personally like the idea of being a part of such a community as Adobe is.
- Your photos are automatically offered on another stock website. If you are contributor on Adobe, your photos are offered for sale on Fotolia as well, since it is a part of Adobe stock.
- Only commercial content is accepted. No editorial content is accepted on Adobe, so make sure there are no visible trademarks and logos on your photos. Also if you shoot lot of editorial, as I do, this can be discouraging, when you need to sort your photos and submit only a small portion of it.
- Long waiting times for approval of your submitted photos. I have found that the waiting times for finding out if your photos are approved is somewhat longer than on other websites. However, they do inform you via email.
- Photos accepted on other websites refused for lack of aesthetic/commercial appeal. I have had my good quality photos, sold multiple times on Shutterstock and Getty images, being refused on Adobe, due to lack of aesthetic/commercial appeal. This can be annoying, especially if you know that your photos are being sold successfully elsewhere. However, they probably know the needs of their market and customers better.
3. Getty Images (Istock)
- Access to exclusive briefs – what to shoot. You can submit your photos to an assignment. Photos are approved faster and it enables you to have more relevant content.
- Your photos are being sold on multiple platforms at the same time. Besides being sold on Istock (Getty) your photos are being sold on Thinkstock and Photo.com.
- Lower royalty fees if you are non-exclusive. If selling photos as non-exclusive photographer, I have found that the fees are slightly lower and very inconsistent, compared to other websites.
- Long waiting times for getting information on your royalty statements. Unlike on Shutterstock, Getty is not so transparent on your downloads and earnings. Although you can find information on number of downloads and views, you need to wait for a statement in order to see your actual earnings.
Please note that all above information are based on my personal experience. Other photographers may have had a different opinions or experiences with the same websites.
If you are reading this, feel free to share your experience with stock photography.
Thanks for stopping by.